Shock Resistance Guide: Protecting Inertial Sensors in High-Impact Environments

Quick Answer: Shock resistance varies by sensor technology: MEMS sensors handle 1,000-10,000g, Quartz MEMS withstand 5,000-50,000g, while FOG systems typically survive 100-1,000g. Key factors include pulse duration (0.1-11ms), mounting design, and protection mechanisms. Military applications require MIL-STD-810 Method 516 compliance.

🛡️ Shock Resistance Fundamentals

Understanding Shock Environments

Shock is a sudden acceleration or deceleration that can damage sensitive inertial sensors. Unlike vibration, shock events are:

• Transient: Short duration (microseconds to milliseconds)
• High Amplitude: Often exceeding normal operating accelerations
• Non-Repetitive: Single events or infrequent occurrences
• Directional: Can occur in any axis or combination of axes

Shock Damage Mechanisms

Mechanical Failure Modes

Structural Damage:
- Proof mass fracture or detachment
- Spring element failure
- Wire bond breakage
- Package cracking

Functional Degradation:
- Bias shift due to stress
- Scale factor changes
- Increased noise levels
- Reduced sensitivity

Failure Thresholds by Technology

Technology	Typical Shock Limit	Failure Mode	Recovery
MEMS	1,000-10,000g	Mechanical fracture	Usually permanent
Quartz MEMS	5,000-50,000g	Crystal damage	May be permanent
FOG	100-1,000g	Fiber damage, electronics	Often permanent

📊 Shock Specifications by Application

Military and Defense Applications

Artillery and Projectiles

Shock Environment:
- Setback: 10,000-100,000g for 1-5ms
- Spin-up: 5,000-50,000g for 0.1-1ms
- Impact: 1,000-10,000g for 0.5-2ms

Sensor Requirements:
- Quartz MEMS: Preferred technology
- Shock Rating: >20,000g survival
- Functional After Shock: >10,000g

Missile Systems

Launch Shock: 1,000-5,000g for 1-10ms
Separation Events: 500-2,000g for 0.5-5ms
Terminal Impact: 100-1,000g for 5-50ms

Design Considerations:
- Multi-axis shock capability
- Functional during and after shock
- Temperature effects on shock resistance

Ground Vehicles

Mine Blast: 100-1,000g for 1-10ms
Crash Impact: 50-500g for 10-100ms
Off-road Impacts: 10-100g for 1-50ms

Protection Strategies:
- Shock isolation mounts
- Protective enclosures
- Redundant sensor systems

Aerospace Applications

Aircraft Systems

Crash Landing: 20-100g for 50-200ms
Hard Landing: 5-20g for 100-500ms
Turbulence: 1-5g for seconds

Requirements:
- DO-160 Section 7 compliance
- Crash survivability standards
- Continued operation capability

Spacecraft

Launch Vibration: Pyrotechnic shock events
Separation Events: 100-10,000g for 0.1-1ms
Docking Impact: 1-10g for 10-100ms

Special Considerations:
- Zero-g operation after shock
- Long-term reliability
- No maintenance capability

Industrial Applications

Manufacturing Equipment

Drop Tests: 50-500g for 1-10ms
Transportation Shock: 10-100g for 5-50ms
Installation Impact: 5-50g for 10-100ms

Design Requirements:
- Repeatable shock survival
- Minimal performance degradation
- Cost-effective protection

🔬 Shock Testing Standards and Methods

Military Standards (MIL-STD-810)

Method 516: Shock Testing

Test Procedures:
- Functional Shock: Device operates during shock
- Crash Safety Shock: Device survives shock
- Fragility Assessment: Determine failure thresholds

Pulse Shapes:
- Half-sine: Most common, smooth acceleration
- Sawtooth: Rapid rise, slower decay
- Trapezoidal: Constant acceleration plateau
- Complex: Real-world shock signatures

Test Levels by Application

Application	Shock Level	Duration	Pulse Shape
Ground Mobile	40g	11ms	Half-sine
Airborne	20g	11ms	Half-sine
Naval	25g	11ms	Half-sine
Artillery	15,000g	0.5ms	Half-sine

Commercial Standards

IEC 60068-2-27: Shock Testing

Test Conditions:
- Acceleration: 50g, 100g, 150g standard levels
- Duration: 6ms, 11ms, 18ms standard durations
- Direction: Each axis, both polarities
- Quantity: 3 shocks per direction (18 total)

ASTM Standards

• ASTM D3332: Drop test methods
• ASTM D5276: Drop test for shipping containers
• ASTM F1596: Four-point bend test for electronics

Automotive Standards

ISO 16750: Road Vehicle Electronics

Mechanical Shock Tests:
- Test A: 50g, 11ms half-sine pulse
- Test B: 100g, 6ms half-sine pulse
- Test C: 150g, 6ms half-sine pulse

Application Areas:
- Engine compartment: Test C
- Passenger compartment: Test B
- Trunk/cargo area: Test A

🛠️ Shock Protection Strategies

Sensor-Level Protection

Mechanical Design Features

Overrange Stops:
- Limit proof mass displacement
- Prevent mechanical damage
- Maintain functionality after shock

Damping Systems:
- Viscous damping for energy dissipation
- Squeeze-film damping in MEMS
- Magnetic damping in some designs

Material Selection

Material Property	Importance	Typical Values
Yield Strength	Prevents permanent deformation	>500 MPa
Fracture Toughness	Resists crack propagation	>20 MPa√m
Fatigue Resistance	Repeated shock survival	>10⁶ cycles
Elastic Modulus	Stiffness and resonance	100-400 GPa

System-Level Protection

Shock Isolation Mounts

Design Principles:
- Natural frequency << shock frequency
- High damping to limit resonance
- Overtravel protection for extreme shocks

Mount Types:
- Elastomeric: Simple, cost-effective
- Wire rope: High temperature, reliable
- Pneumatic: Adjustable, very effective

Protective Enclosures

Enclosure Design:
- Rigid outer shell for impact distribution
- Soft inner liner for shock absorption
- Secure mounting to prevent rattling

Materials:
- Aluminum: Lightweight, good strength
- Steel: Maximum protection, heavier
- Composites: Tailored properties

Electronic Protection

Power Supply Protection

Shock Effects on Electronics:
- Momentary power interruption
- Voltage spikes from inductance
- Component displacement/failure

Protection Methods:
- Bypass capacitors for power continuity
- Transient voltage suppressors
- Flexible circuit connections

Data Integrity

Shock-Induced Errors:
- False readings during shock event
- Memory corruption from power loss
- Communication interface disruption

Mitigation Strategies:
- Error detection and correction codes
- Data buffering and validation
- Automatic system restart procedures

📐 Shock Analysis and Modeling

Shock Response Spectrum (SRS)

SRS Fundamentals

The Shock Response Spectrum shows the maximum response of single-degree-of-freedom systems to a shock input.

SRS Calculation:
For each natural frequency fn:
1. Apply shock input to SDOF system
2. Calculate maximum response
3. Plot maximum vs. frequency

Key Parameters:
- Q factor (damping): Typically Q=10
- Frequency range: 100 Hz to 10 kHz
- Response type: Acceleration, velocity, displacement

SRS Applications

• Specification Development: Define shock requirements
• Component Selection: Compare sensor capabilities
• Test Planning: Design appropriate test fixtures
• Damage Assessment: Predict failure modes

Finite Element Analysis (FEA)

Modeling Considerations

Mesh Requirements:
- Element size < 1/10 wavelength at highest frequency
- Refined mesh at stress concentrations
- Proper element types for shock analysis

Material Models:
- Linear elastic for small deformations
- Nonlinear for large deformations
- Failure criteria for damage prediction

Analysis Types

Analysis Type	Purpose	Computational Cost
Modal	Natural frequencies and modes	Low
Transient	Time-domain response	High
Frequency Response	Frequency-domain analysis	Medium
Random Response	Statistical analysis	Medium

🔧 Design Guidelines and Best Practices

Sensor Selection Criteria

Shock Rating Interpretation

Survival Shock: Maximum shock without permanent damage
- Sensor may not function during shock
- Full performance restored after shock
- No calibration shift or degradation

Functional Shock: Maximum shock with continued operation
- Sensor maintains accuracy during shock
- Typically 10-50% of survival shock level
- Critical for real-time applications

Safety Factors

Application	Safety Factor	Rationale
Commercial	2-3x	Cost optimization, moderate reliability
Industrial	3-5x	Higher reliability, harsh environments
Military	5-10x	Mission critical, extreme environments
Space	10-20x	No repair capability, long missions

Mounting Design Guidelines

Rigid Mounting

Advantages:
- Maximum shock transmission to sensor
- Sensor experiences full environment
- Simple, reliable connection

Disadvantages:
- No shock attenuation
- Requires high-shock-rated sensors
- Potential for stress concentration

Isolated Mounting

Advantages:
- Reduces shock transmission
- Protects sensitive sensors
- Allows use of lower-rated sensors

Disadvantages:
- More complex design
- Potential for resonance amplification
- May affect sensor performance

Installation Best Practices

Mounting Hardware

Fastener Selection:
- Material: Match thermal expansion
- Torque: Follow manufacturer specifications
- Thread locker: Prevent loosening from shock
- Inspection: Regular torque verification

Mounting Surface:
- Flatness: <0.025mm over sensor footprint
- Finish: 1.6 μm Ra or better
- Cleanliness: Free of debris and contamination

Stress Relief

Cable Management:
- Service loops to accommodate movement
- Strain relief at connector interfaces
- Flexible cable types for shock environments

Thermal Considerations:
- Thermal expansion matching
- Stress relief for temperature cycling
- Thermal barriers if needed

📊 Testing and Validation

Shock Test Setup

Test Equipment

Shock Test Machine:
- Pneumatic: Simple, cost-effective
- Drop tower: High-energy capability
- Electrodynamic: Precise control
- Pyrotechnic: Extreme shock levels

Instrumentation:
- Accelerometers: Monitor test conditions
- Data acquisition: High-speed sampling
- High-speed cameras: Observe failure modes

Test Procedures

Pre-test:
1. Baseline performance measurement
2. Visual inspection and documentation
3. Mounting verification
4. Instrumentation calibration

Test Execution:
1. Apply specified shock levels
2. Monitor sensor response
3. Document any anomalies
4. Verify test conditions

Post-test:
1. Performance verification
2. Visual inspection for damage
3. Functional testing
4. Data analysis and reporting

Acceptance Criteria

Performance Requirements

Functional Criteria:
- Bias stability: <2x specification after shock
- Scale factor: <1% change from pre-shock
- Noise level: <1.5x specification
- Bandwidth: No significant reduction

Physical Criteria:
- No visible damage or deformation
- Secure mounting (no looseness)
- Electrical continuity maintained
- Proper connector engagement

🔗 Related Resources

Technical Documentation

• Vibration Isolation Techniques - Mechanical protection methods
• Environmental Testing Guide - Comprehensive test procedures
• Installation Best Practices - Mounting and integration

Application Guides

• Military Applications - Defense system requirements
• Aerospace Integration - Aviation and space applications
• Industrial Applications - Manufacturing and automation

Standards and Compliance

• MIL-STD-810 Testing - Military environmental standards
• DO-160 Compliance - Aviation shock requirements
• IEC Standards - International shock testing standards

📞 Expert Consultation

Need help with shock-resistant sensor selection or testing?

Our mechanical and test engineers provide:

• Shock Analysis - Environmental assessment and modeling
• Sensor Selection - Optimal technology for your shock environment
• Protection Design - Custom shock isolation solutions
• Testing Services - MIL-STD-810 and commercial shock testing

Contact Our Shock Testing Specialists:

• Email: [email protected]
• Phone: +1-555-GNC-TEST
• Testing Portal: testing.gnc-tech.com

---

📋 Shock Resistance Quick Reference

Shock Ratings by Technology

Technology	Survival Shock	Functional Shock	Typical Applications
Consumer MEMS	1,000-3,000g	100-500g	Mobile devices, wearables
Industrial MEMS	3,000-10,000g	500-2,000g	Robotics, automation
Tactical MEMS	10,000-20,000g	2,000-5,000g	Military vehicles, UAVs
Quartz MEMS	20,000-50,000g	5,000-15,000g	Artillery, missiles
FOG Systems	100-1,000g	20-200g	Ships, precision platforms

Standard Test Conditions

Standard	Shock Level	Duration	Pulse Shape	Applications
MIL-STD-810 (Ground)	40g	11ms	Half-sine	Military ground vehicles
MIL-STD-810 (Air)	20g	11ms	Half-sine	Aircraft systems
DO-160	6-15g	11ms	Half-sine	Commercial aviation
IEC 60068	50-150g	6-18ms	Half-sine	Industrial equipment
ISO 16750	50-150g	6-11ms	Half-sine	Automotive systems

---

Keywords: shock resistance, impact protection, sensor durability, environmental testing, MIL-STD-810, shock isolation, mechanical protection, inertial sensor shock

Last Updated: 2025-10-01 | Standards: MIL-STD-810, DO-160, IEC 60068